Because the doctrine of the Real Presence is
rooted in the supernatural work of God
as expressed in Scripture, it is as true – yet as inexplicable – as the doctrine
of the Trinity. Because it is grounded
in the supernatural work of God expressed in Scripture, the Real Presence is as
true – and as inexplicable – as the reality that Jesus is 100% human and 100%
God. Because the Real Presence rests squarely on the supernatural work of God taught
by Scripture, it is as true – yet as inexplicable – as the doctrine that we can
be born again and become a new creation in Christ.
We ought not to insist
our natural and finite minds grasp the supernatural and infinite work of God.
Here
is what God-in-the-flesh taught His disciples early in His ministry (John 6:48ff):
I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the
manna in the wilderness, and they died.. . . 51 I am the living bread that came down out of heaven;
if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I
will give for the life of the world is My flesh . . . “Truly, truly, I say to
you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have
no life in yourselves. 54 He
who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up
on the last day. 55 For
My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink.”
Then, just before His
crucifixion, at the end of His earthly ministry, the Lord gathered His disciples
for the Last Supper. Matthew records it this way:
“While
they were eating, Jesus took some bread, and after a blessing, He broke it and
gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is My body.” 27 And when He
had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, “Drink
from it, all of you; 28 for this is My blood of the covenant, which
is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.” (Matthew
26:26ff)
Years later, the apostle Paul addressed the
subject in 1 Corinthians 10:16 – Is not the cup of blessing which
we bless a ‘sharing’ in the blood of Christ? Is not the bread which we break a ‘sharing’
in the body of Christ?”
It is also worth noting that Christian
theologians of the early centuries – even before the Roman Catholic Church
gained religious ascendancy in the West – early Doctors of the Church would
have thoroughly rejected the idea that the Lord’s words in John 6 and later at
the Last Supper were merely symbolic.
For example:
St. Ignatius of Antioch
(c. 110 A.D.) “I desire the Bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ,
who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love
incorruptible.” (Letter to the Romans 7:3)
St. Justin the Martyr (c. 100 - 165
A.D.) “For not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but since
Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had both
flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the food
which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down by
Him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nourished, is both the
flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus.” (First Apology, 66)
And there are many
other theologians who are well-respected in Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox
circles today, who also believed in the Real Presence. For example:
Irenaeus
of Lyons (c. 140 - 202 A.D.)
Tertullian (c. 155 - 250 A.D.)
Origen (c. 185 - 254 A.D.)
Clement of Alexandria (c. 150 -
216 A.D.)
Cyprian of Carthage (c. 200 -
258 A.D.)
Athanasius (c. 295 - 373 A.D.)
Basil the Great (c. 330 - 379
A.D.)
Gregory of Nazianz (c. 330 - 389
A.D.)
John
Chrysostom (c. 344 - 407 A.D.)
Ambrose
of Milan (c. 333 - 397 A.D.)
Jerome
(c. 347 - 420 A.D.)
Augustine
(c. 354 - 430 A.D.)
And, finally (if there could be a final
comment about the Real Presence), Martin Luther, the leader
of the Protestant Reformation, also believed in the Real Presence of Jesus in
the Eucharist.
So, what’s the point? When the Lord
Jesus spoke of His Body and Blood in John 6, and to His disciples at the Last
Supper, did He intend His words to be taken symbolically or metaphorically?
Or did He expect us to take His words as literally as when He said: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me will live, even if he dies. And everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die”? (John 11:25-26)
Or did He expect us to take His words as literally as when He said: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me will live, even if he dies. And everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die”? (John 11:25-26)
No comments:
Post a Comment